A famous architect said buildings should serve people, not the other wayaround. What do you think this means? Do you agree? Why or why not?

A famous architect said, "buildings should serve people, not the other way around".  I strongly agree with this because a building should be constructed according to its function to serve the people who will later use it. If a building is unable to perform its most basic functions, then it is undoubtedly a failed project. For example, if an architect is building a primary school then they must consider parking areas, how cars will pick up and drop off children, where to put the playground, access for people with disabilities, and that is just the area around the school. A beautiful parking lot that only has room for a handful of cars is useless. Inside the school, they also need classrooms that are large enough, hallways that do not get easily too crowded, a good number and location of restrooms, etc.... If the architect is overly focused on how the school looks, then they may sacrifice ease of use and practicality. So We should focus on the use-value of a building rather than building it and then looking at it